indiancritic
Subscribe

The Thar Roxx Is a Fine Off-Roader and an Overqualified Answer to the School Run

Mahindra has made the Thar far more usable, but buyers still confuse capability with suitability. Most should choose a sensible two-wheel-drive trim—or admit they really want a different SUV.

Arjun Chawla
· 5 min read
The Thar Roxx Is a Fine Off-Roader and an Overqualified Answer to the School Run
The Drivers Hub / CC BY 4.0

Advertisement

The Mahindra Thar Roxx is an impressive engineering and marketing achievement. It turns a lifestyle off-roader into something close enough to a family SUV that thousands of buyers can rationalise the purchase over dinner. I have no objection to irrational cars; they make roads and lives more interesting. My objection is to irrational cars sold through practical arguments. The Roxx is tall, capable, charismatic and available with enough equipment to make a showroom salesperson briefly forget the existence of physics. It is also a body-on-frame vehicle whose strengths many owners will never use and whose compromises they will meet daily. Autocar India’s 19,000km long-term report praised its off-road ability and equipment while recording efficiency, ride and electronic frustrations. That is the ownership conversation, not the heroic launch film.

Capability is not free

Real four-wheel-drive hardware adds weight, cost and mechanical complexity. A ladder-frame chassis and off-road geometry help on broken trails, but they influence ride, handling, access and efficiency everywhere else. If your most hostile terrain is a mall ramp, buying the heaviest drivetrain is not preparedness. It is cosplay with an EMI. I do not say this to sneer at aspiration. Cars are emotional purchases, and enjoying the way a vehicle looks is a valid reason to own it. Just do not pretend a low-range gearbox is essential because Bengaluru has potholes.

The Roxx improves enormously on the three-door Thar as everyday transport. Rear access is civilised, space is usable and the cabin offers modern comfort. The engines are strong, the seating position commanding and the road presence undeniable. Yet a monocoque crossover at similar money will usually ride more calmly, consume less fuel and feel easier in urban manoeuvres. The right choice depends on what you value. The wrong choice begins when a buyer expects the Roxx to erase the basic character that made it desirable.

Stop climbing the trim ladder automatically

Indian buyers are trained to ask for the “top model” before they have identified which features they need. Manufacturers exploit this by bundling desirable safety or convenience equipment with decorative wheels, panoramic roofs and electronic gimmicks. The Roxx range is extensive enough to turn configuration into postgraduate study. Autocar’s variant guidance identifies the AX5L as a strong-value option and points to the MX5 for buyers who can skip some advanced driver assistance. My advice is simpler: choose the cheapest variant containing your non-negotiables, then stop.

Six airbags, stability control, a usable reversing camera and basic comfort matter. Giant wheels often worsen ride and replacement cost. A panoramic sunroof looks excellent under showroom lights and spends much of an Indian summer hidden behind its blind. ADAS can help on well-marked roads but may irritate on chaotic ones if calibration and controls are poor. Ventilated seats are genuinely useful in India; an illuminated badge is not. Make a list before entering the showroom because the showroom is designed to replace lists with desire.

Petrol, diesel and the fantasy of annual mileage

Buyers often choose diesel reflexively for torque and efficiency without calculating annual use, fuel-price differences, maintenance, regulatory uncertainty and purchase premium. The Roxx diesel suits frequent highway travel and is required for four-wheel drive, while the petrol offers effortless performance but can be thirsty. Neither is economical transport. Ask how many kilometres you actually drove last year, not how many you imagine driving after buying an adventure vehicle.

An automatic gearbox is valuable in traffic, but it adds cost and changes the way strong engines deliver fuel economy. Test-drive the exact powertrain and wheel size you plan to buy. A short dealership loop on smooth roads reveals almost nothing. Find broken surfaces, a tight parking space, a speed breaker and a faster stretch. Sit in the rear while somebody else drives. Families often approve a vehicle from the front seats and discover its ride from the back after delivery.

Long-term annoyances beat brochure victories

The long-term reports mention issues such as wipers, muddy spray, small door pockets, screen glitches and a firm low-speed ride. None individually ruins the vehicle. Together they determine whether affection survives. Ownership is built from small interactions: where a bottle fits, whether the camera stays clean, how easily luggage loads and whether the infotainment wakes reliably. Review scores compress these into a number, but owners live them one junction at a time.

Mahindra’s recent vehicles offer strong performance and features, yet software polish and service consistency must keep pace with ambition. Buyers should examine local workshop reputation, parts availability and warranty terms. A national brand image cannot repair your car; the service adviser ten kilometres away can. Speak to local owners without the salesperson present.

Who needs four-wheel drive

If you regularly travel to farms, remote worksites, mountain trails or genuinely difficult terrain, the Roxx 4x4 makes sense. Learn how to use the system, buy appropriate tyres and understand recovery points. Four-wheel drive does not repeal traction. It can carry an inexperienced driver farther into trouble. Most urban buyers should choose rear-wheel drive, retain the appearance and save money and weight. Better still, they should compare a conventional SUV honestly before deciding that image outweighs comfort.

There is no shame in buying a Thar because you love it. There is shame only in inventing utility calculations to persuade a reluctant spouse. Say you enjoy the upright stance, the visual drama and the knowledge that the vehicle can do more than your routine demands. Pleasure is allowed. It simply should not be confused with value.

My pick, with conditions

I would avoid the most ornamented trim unless its specific equipment solves a real need. A mid-range diesel automatic two-wheel-drive configuration will suit many buyers who want the Roxx experience without paying for unused off-road hardware. Those intending serious trails should choose four-wheel drive and accept the running costs. Petrol buyers should enter with eyes open about consumption.

The Thar Roxx deserves its popularity because it possesses character in a segment crowded with interchangeable shapes. It is far more practical than its sibling and astonishingly broad in ability. But breadth does not mean it is best at everything. For commuting, school runs and highway holidays, a lighter monocoque may be the better tool. Buy the Roxx because its particular compromises make you smile, not because a brochure has convinced you they no longer exist.

#mahindra thar roxx #suv #car buying #variants
Arjun Chawla

Written by

Has driven everything sold in this country and isn't impressed by half of it. Writes about value, reliability, and the trims nobody needed.

More by Arjun →

Advertisement

Comments 0

No comments yet. Be the first to weigh in.

More in Automobiles

View all →